Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Am J Public Health ; 112(1): 144-153, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1841232

RESUMEN

Objectives. To describe associations between neighborhood racial and economic segregation and violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. For 13 US cities, we obtained zip code-level data on 5 violence outcomes from March through July 2018 through 2020. Using negative binomial regressions and marginal contrasts, we estimated differences between quintiles of racial, economic, and racialized economic segregation using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes as a measure of neighborhood privilege (1) in 2020 and (2) relative to 2018 through 2019 (difference-in-differences). Results. In 2020, violence was higher in less-privileged neighborhoods than in the most privileged. For example, if all zip codes were in the least privileged versus most privileged quintile of racialized economic segregation, we estimated 146.2 additional aggravated assaults (95% confidence interval = 112.4, 205.8) per zip code on average across cities. Differences over time in less-privileged zip codes were greater than differences over time in the most privileged for firearm violence, aggravated assault, and homicide. Conclusions. Marginalized communities endure endemically high levels of violence. The events of 2020 exacerbated disparities in several forms of violence. Public Health Implications. To reduce violence and related disparities, immediate and long-term investments in low-income neighborhoods of color are warranted. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):144-153. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306540).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales , Características de la Residencia/clasificación , Segregación Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudades/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Violación/estadística & datos numéricos , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Robo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263777, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1705282

RESUMEN

This study examines changes in gun violence at the census tract level in Philadelphia, PA before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Piecewise generalized linear mixed effects models are used to test the relative impacts of social-structural and demographic factors, police activity, the presence of and proximity to drug markets, and physical incivilities on shooting changes between 2017 and June, 2021. Model results revealed that neighborhood structural characteristics like concentrated disadvantage and racial makeup, as well as proximity to drug markets and police activity were associated with higher shooting rates. Neighborhood drug market activity and police activity significantly predicted changes in shooting rates over time after the onset of COVID-19. This work demonstrates the importance of understanding whether there are unique factors that impact the susceptibility to exogenous shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic. The increasing risk of being in a neighborhood with an active drug market during the pandemic suggests efforts related to disrupting drug organizations, or otherwise curbing violence stemming from drug markets, may go a long way towards quelling citywide increases in gun violence.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/virología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Tráfico de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pandemias , Philadelphia/epidemiología , Policia , Racismo , Características de la Residencia , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Am J Nurs ; 121(10): 19-20, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1450420
6.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 7(1): e24562, 2021 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1011352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Twitter has emerged as a novel way for physicians to share ideas and advocate for policy change. #ThisIsOurLane (firearm injury) and #GetUsPPE (COVID-19) are examples of nationwide health care-led Twitter campaigns that went viral. Health care-initiated Twitter hashtags regarding major public health topics have gained national attention, but their content has not been systematically examined. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that Twitter discourse on two epidemics (firearm injury and COVID-19) would differ between tweets with health care-initiated hashtags (#ThisIsOurLane and #GetUsPPE) versus those with non-health care-initiated hashtags (#GunViolence and #COVID19). METHODS: Using natural language processing, we compared content, affect, and authorship of a random 1% of tweets using #ThisIsOurLane (Nov 2018-Oct 2019) and #GetUsPPE (March-May 2020), compared to #GunViolence and #COVID19 tweets, respectively. We extracted the relative frequency of single words and phrases and created two sets of features: (1) an open-vocabulary feature set to create 50 data-driven-determined word clusters to evaluate the content of tweets; and (2) a closed-vocabulary feature for psycholinguistic categorization among case and comparator tweets. In accordance with conventional linguistic analysis, we used a P<.001, after adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction, to identify potentially meaningful correlations between language features and outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 67% (n=4828) of #ThisIsOurLane tweets and 36.6% (n=7907) of #GetUsPPE tweets were authored by health care professionals, compared to 16% (n=1152) of #GunViolence and 9.8% (n=2117) of #COVID19 tweets. Tweets using #ThisIsOurLane and #GetUsPPE were more likely to contain health care-specific language; more language denoting positive emotions, affiliation, and group identity; and more action-oriented content compared to tweets with #GunViolence or #COVID19, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tweets with health care-led hashtags expressed more positivity and more action-oriented language than the comparison hashtags. As social media is increasingly used for news discourse, public education, and grassroots organizing, the public health community can take advantage of social media's broad reach to amplify truthful, actionable messages around public health issues.


Asunto(s)
Violencia con Armas/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/psicología , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/instrumentación , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/transmisión , Estudios Transversales , Violencia con Armas/psicología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/tendencias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA